tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post1072137067836283845..comments2022-04-08T09:09:10.580-07:00Comments on Science 202: Gummy Bear LabMrs. Hrubyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02575512714544973977noreply@blogger.comBlogger65125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-56283140890751511742007-10-11T12:13:00.001-07:002007-10-11T12:13:00.001-07:00Dennis and Saria1. We said the gummy bear would sh...Dennis and Saria<BR/>1. We said the gummy bear would shrink size and dissolve. Our gummy bear expanded in the fresh water.<BR/>2.Our volume increased more to be seven times larger,. Meanwhile the mass quadrupled.<BR/>3.Our density changed with decrease. The water reduced the density and the mass and volume had different changes.<BR/>$ The bear became softer.DENNIS EHRHARDThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03280650690325733478noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-68038155804085360602007-10-11T12:13:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:13:00.000-07:001. Yes becuase it got bigger and discolored.2. Our...1. Yes becuase it got bigger and discolored.<BR/>2. Our gummy bear got a greater number in volume then mass because it got moree water in it.<BR/>3. Our gummy bear density Yes it did change because the volume and the mass went up..<BR/>4. Our bear was big! Tasted nasty. Like water and saltkrazygurl101https://www.blogger.com/profile/09879710098517646779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-75088313535955924022007-10-11T12:12:00.002-07:002007-10-11T12:12:00.002-07:001. yes our hypothsis was correct because we said i...1. yes our hypothsis was correct because we said it would expand and it (in other words it got bigger and that is what we guessed)<BR/>2.the volume had the greatest change because the volume changed 7 and the mass changed 6.5. also the volume was bigger in the begining so it had to be bigger in the end.<BR/>3.yes but not that much because it expanded so it kind of had to have grater density, so all the stuff inside expanded too.<BR/>4.they are probably going to have the calculations as we did.<BR/>-Kelsey and Jack Hour: 050cherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-73489468667041977442007-10-11T12:12:00.001-07:002007-10-11T12:12:00.001-07:001. Our hypothesis was that the gummy bear was goin...1. Our hypothesis was that the gummy bear was goin to expand. We were correct, the gummy bear did expand.<BR/>2. Our mass was greater then our volume. On day 1 out volume was 1mL, and our mass was 2.6g. On day 2 our volume was 7mL, and our mass was 8.2g.<BR/>3.Yes there was because the water seeps into the gummy worm and adds more density to it.<BR/>4. Our gummy bear eventually completely fell apart.<BR/>5. Sarah, StephanieSarahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13709661501548735488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-83769645792659711892007-10-11T12:12:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:12:00.000-07:00Jen and Ian1. Our hypothesis was incorrect, b/c w...Jen and Ian<BR/>1. Our hypothesis was incorrect, b/c we thought it would shrink.<BR/>2. volume was greater after then night in the water.<BR/>3.there was a small change in density b/cit expanded so much.<BR/>4. our bear was BEASTLY. but it taster horriblé. haha.Jenn!!https://www.blogger.com/profile/07659641138999578231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-90280361177116061402007-10-11T12:11:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:11:00.000-07:001. our hypotheis was correct we thought it would g...1. our hypotheis was correct we thought it would get big and it did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <BR/>2. volume had a change of3.95 more than it was ,my name is underdog(vvms) and bathound<BR/>3. volume is more than mass it had a big change<BR/>4.our results are pretty close to othersTony Sipehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02665959588738639143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-16946991365628771062007-10-11T12:10:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:10:00.000-07:001.Yes our hypothesis was correct. We thought that ...1.Yes our hypothesis was correct. We thought that the gummy Bear (Billy-Bob-Joe-Bob-Frank) would get bigger.<BR/> 2. Our Mass changed the most it changed 5.6grams an the volume changed 1ml<BR/>3. Yes int did change because it gained more volume.<BR/>4. Our bear was really big. And it was really sugery and also veery mushy!!!!cherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-15447074898685036522007-10-11T12:09:00.002-07:002007-10-11T12:09:00.002-07:00My bear got smaller not bigger.My bear got smaller not bigger.Juliohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14323210668358390499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-67947328412575350942007-10-11T12:09:00.001-07:002007-10-11T12:09:00.001-07:00it didntvolume3 greamsit tasted okit didnt<BR/>volume<BR/>3 greams<BR/>it tasted oknathan87https://www.blogger.com/profile/10378771478718410489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-23124685067596815382007-10-11T12:09:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:09:00.000-07:001.Our hypothosis wasw that the gummy bear was goin...1.Our hypothosis wasw that the gummy bear was going to get bigger and it did. WE WERE RIGHT!<BR/>2.the volume was a greater change than the mass.<BR/>3.yes the density changed because the bear became more dence.<BR/>4.It changed color.<BR/>5Andrew ,tristaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-46825109909993332622007-10-11T12:08:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:08:00.000-07:00My hypothesis was incorrect My gummy bear got bigg...My hypothesis was incorrect My gummy bear got bigger not smallerJuliohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14323210668358390499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-73981205238350613862007-10-11T12:05:00.001-07:002007-10-11T12:05:00.001-07:00Andrew And TristaOur gummy bear got a lot bigger j...Andrew And Trista<BR/><BR/>Our gummy bear got a lot bigger just as we guessed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-12628392456067529122007-10-11T12:05:00.000-07:002007-10-11T12:05:00.000-07:001.Yes our hypothesis was correct. We thought that ...1.Yes our hypothesis was correct. We thought that the gummy Bear (Billy-Bob-Joe-Bob-Frank) would get bigger.<BR/> 2. Our Mass changed the most it changed 5.6grams an the volume changed 1ml<BR/>3. Yes int did change because it gained more volume.<BR/>4. Our bear was really big. And it was really sugery and also veery mushy!!!!cherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-14210760368871223722007-10-11T11:24:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:24:00.000-07:001. Our hypothesis was wrong. We thought our gummy ...1. Our hypothesis was wrong. We thought our gummy bear would shrink when instead it got really big.<BR/>2.The mass was the greatest change, it changed 5.4 while our volume changed 3.48.<BR/>widthchanged 1<BR/>our length changed1.4<BR/>our density changed to 5.248Dallas Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05570447605123220837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-19907396045653726172007-10-11T11:20:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:20:00.000-07:001. Our hypothesis was correct we thought the gummy...1. Our hypothesis was correct we thought the gummy bear would get bigger and slimmy.<BR/>2. The mass was greater <BR/>3. Yes there was a chnage in density its grew 5.15g/cm.<BR/>4. Our bear was huge and its was very slimmy and breakable andits tased really badcherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-62818013463906539782007-10-11T11:19:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:19:00.000-07:00Sarah Michelle & Whitney Marie;1. Our hypothesis w...Sarah Michelle & Whitney Marie;<BR/><BR/>1. Our hypothesis was somewhat correct. We thought our gummy bear would be gooey & it was...but we never thought it would get BIG!<BR/>2.Our Mass ended up having a greater change than the volume.On the first day our mass was 2.6 grams & today our gummy girl's mass was 8.2 grams.<BR/>3. Yes, because the volume and mass changed so we had to recalculate it...volume/mass<BR/>4. OUR GUMMY GIRL TASTED PRETTY NASTYYYY! TALK ABOUT A WATERED DOWN <BR/>TASTE. too-T-les * *<BR/> USarStenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15122176989875013247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-43349230382766107832007-10-11T11:17:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:17:00.000-07:00Miki & Megan1. our hypothesis was just the opposit...Miki & Megan<BR/>1. our hypothesis was just the opposite<BR/>2.The volume had the greatest change<BR/>3.THe change in density was .o3g/cm3<BR/>4.I agree with Hannahs group. SAME HERE!!cherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-59635937161565899092007-10-11T11:16:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:16:00.000-07:001.we thought it would shrink but it got bigger. we...1.we thought it would shrink but it got bigger. we also said the color would fade into the water and it did so we were kinda right but kinda wrong.<BR/>2. the volume changed more because it soaked up water. <BR/>3. yes, because the mass changed so the density changed because mass is part of density. <BR/>4. the other classmates had similar answers but not exactly the same.<BR/><BR/><BR/>from kelsey and kieumy<BR/>:]ohhh its Kelsey ..https://www.blogger.com/profile/12267572233649258496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-88789822413320761862007-10-11T11:15:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:15:00.000-07:001. Our hypothesis was incorrect. We thought it wou...1. Our hypothesis was incorrect. We thought it would disolve in water.<BR/>2. Volume changed more than the mass did. The volume had a change of 14 cm3 while mass had a change of 6.3g.<BR/>3. The density lowered as it got bigger. As it got bigger, the volume got bigger and the atoms were less packed together.<BR/>4. Our gummy bear got really big.<BR/>.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09719113825317233011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-87077821503148630822007-10-11T11:13:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:13:00.000-07:00Lizzie and Natasha1. Our hypothesis was wrong. We ...Lizzie and Natasha<BR/><BR/>1. Our hypothesis was wrong. We thought it was going to get smaller and it got bigger.<BR/>2. Volume had the biggest change.<BR/>3. Yes, there was a change in the density, because the mass and the volume changed.<BR/>4. Our bear's name was Owen. We didn'r name it. We also didn't eat him. Jesse and Richard did. That was sad, but not like shipping your kid off to prison school sad. Just sad.Lizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16075469805870745623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-41589423256391593762007-10-11T11:12:00.001-07:002007-10-11T11:12:00.001-07:00mitch and andre 1.our hypothesis was incorrect, we...mitch and andre <BR/>1.our hypothesis was incorrect, we thought the gummy bear would get smaller but it grew bigger.<BR/>2.volume had a greater change but not by much.<BR/>3.yes their was a negitive change in the density of .45Andrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02506683200298050599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-77424824611672170532007-10-11T11:12:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:12:00.000-07:00Steven and tim said Are hypothesis was not co...Steven and tim said Are hypothesis was not correct, it got bigger.<BR/>the volume was greater<BR/>there was a chsnge in our densitytimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02425749835738444359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-36847423573014201632007-10-11T11:11:00.000-07:002007-10-11T11:11:00.000-07:00Rebecca and Dancia 1. Half of our hypothesis was c...Rebecca and Dancia <BR/>1. Half of our hypothesis was correct. We thought it would turn the water red, and desolve, but it only turned the water red. In fact, it grew bigger! <BR/>2. The volume is greater. The volume changed by 6 and the mass changed by 5.4. Therefore, the volume was greater. <BR/>3. The density didnt change because the volume and mass changed at the same rate. <BR/>4. Our bear was pretty big and it looked like the rest of the bears.cherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-26323211348737879792007-10-11T10:27:00.000-07:002007-10-11T10:27:00.000-07:00LEXI and AARON1. Our hyphothesis was wrong. We tho...LEXI and AARON<BR/>1. Our hyphothesis was wrong. We thought that the color of the gummy bear woild disappear.<BR/>2. volume had a greater change. our volume change was 5cm3 and our mass was 5.1 grams.<BR/>3. Yes there was a change in density. The gummy bear was less dense after sitting in the cup for the whole night. It was less dense because it stretched out and had more space.<BR/>4. Our density decreased like joe and cheyenne. Both of our volume and mass increased.<BR/><BR/>thats it :Dcherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1936214045479435599.post-48992582226256934702007-10-11T10:26:00.001-07:002007-10-11T10:26:00.001-07:00Our hypothesis was the gummy bear would dissolve. ...Our hypothesis was the gummy bear would dissolve. Our hypothesis was incorrect because the gummy bear expanded instead of what we thought dissolve. Mass was the greater change because the mass change was 6.1 while the volume change was 6. There was a little change in density because it went from 1.05g/mL to 1 g/mL. Our bear's name was Phylis Wylis. <BR/><BR/>Maria and Willcherokee& cathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11717474432816644314noreply@blogger.com